APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
rozayFollow100%Win Rate +54.9%ROI 10Tips 1.55Avg Odds -
2
SPORT249Won 14/16Follow87.5%Win Rate +47.5%ROI 17Tips 1.69Avg Odds -
3
ConstanceWon 17/20Follow85%Win Rate +27.7%ROI 20Tips 1.54Avg Odds -
4
88SOCCERWon 5/5Follow83.3%Win Rate +49.3%ROI 12Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
5
Only1TobiazWon 12/15Follow80%Win Rate +48.2%ROI 16Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
6
AnalysisFollow80%Win Rate +54.1%ROI 10Tips 1.94Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
ScoopSnaxChicago Fire has shown better offensive efficiency in their encounter with Toronto FC. Their offensive conversion rate is 22%, higher than Toronto's 18%. The xG efficiency stands at 1.2 for Chicago compared to Toronto's 0.9, indicating Chicago's ability to finish attacks effectively. In terms of passing, Chicago has a key - pass success rate of 82%. The value of their forward - field passes is higher, which creates real threats. In midfield control, Chicago holds a 52% possession rate and combines it with a fast transition speed. This allows them to effectively dictate the game's rhythm. Physically, Chicago has an edge as well. Their total distance covered in the game is 110 km, and they lead in the number of high - intensity sprints. This supports their continuous high - pressure pressing. Chicago Fire has been showing better offensive efficiency in their confrontation with Toronto FC. The offensive finishing conversion rate of Chicago Fire is 22%, higher than Toronto FC's 18%. The xGAH
MLS
Toronto FC
2-1
Chicago Fire
-
Liam 665 Won 4/4Chicago Fire has demonstrated superior offensive efficiency in the face - off against Toronto FC. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 22%, higher than Toronto's 18%. The xG efficiency of 1.2 compared to Toronto's 0.9 also reflects Chicago's efficient finishing ability. In terms of passing, Chicago's key passing success rate is 82%. Their forward - field passes are of higher value, creating real threats to the opponent. In midfield control, Chicago holds a 52% possession rate and combines it with a rapid transition speed, which allows them to effectively dictate the game's rhythm. Physically, Chicago has an edge as well. Their total running distance of 110 km and the number of high - intensity sprints throughout the game are both higher, which supports their continuous high - pressure pressing.O/UMLS
Toronto FC
2-1
Chicago Fire
68 -
Oscar El Monix〽️🐐The recent head - to - head records between Toronto FC and Chicago Fire show a delicate balance and a back - and - forth struggle in terms of tactical play and strength comparison. Looking back at the past few years' encounter data, it's clear that the performance of both teams has fluctuated over different periods, and there's a complex relationship of mutual restraint. In a previous match, Chicago Fire demonstrated its resilience at home by defeating Toronto FC 2 - 1. This victory not only ended certain uncertainties in their rivalry but also highlighted the home - field advantage of Chicago Fire. Toronto FC, on the other hand, will be eager to regain their form and turn the tables when they host Chicago Fire at home. The upcoming game is expected to be a closely - contested battle as both teams will bring their best to the pitch. With the balance between the two so fine, it's difficult to predict the outcome, but fans can surely expect an exciting game. Looking at the historical encAHMLS
Toronto FC
2-1
Chicago Fire
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X