APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
rozayFollow100%Win Rate +54.9%ROI 10Tips 1.55Avg Odds -
2
SPORT249Won 14/16Follow87.5%Win Rate +47.5%ROI 17Tips 1.69Avg Odds -
3
ConstanceWon 17/20Follow85%Win Rate +27.7%ROI 20Tips 1.54Avg Odds -
4
88SOCCERWon 5/5Follow83.3%Win Rate +49.3%ROI 12Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
5
Only1TobiazWon 12/15Follow80%Win Rate +48.2%ROI 16Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
6
AnalysisFollow80%Win Rate +54.1%ROI 10Tips 1.94Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
GavinwangLooking at the latest league standings and basic statistics, the competitive states of Columbus Crew and Colorado Rapids show distinct differences. Columbus Crew currently ranks 15th in the Eastern Conference. In 22 games, they've achieved 5 wins, 5 draws, and 12 losses, accumulating only 20 points. Their win - rate hovers around a low 22.7%. The team's overall defense has obvious flaws, conceding 39 goals, which reveals the instability of their defensive end. However, it's worth noting that their performance at home is relatively stable. In 11 home games, they've maintained a balanced goal record of 14 goals for and 14 against. The average number of goals scored and conceded per game is around 1.3. This indicates that the team can maintain a basic offensive and defensive rhythm in a familiar environment. Columbus Crew has had a rough patch, with only one win and one draw in the past six months. The record of nine goals scored against fourteen conceded shows significant fluctuations inAH
MLS
Columbus Crew
1-0
Colorado Rapids
-
Garoux 777The Colorado Rapids have shown a clear edge over the Columbus Crew in offensive efficiency. The Rapids' conversion rate of offensive opportunities stands at 28%, significantly higher than the Crew's 18%. Their xG efficiency is 1.15, compared to the Crew's 0.92, indicating a more effective finishing ability. In passing efficiency, the Rapids also lead. They have a key - pass success rate of 85%, and their front - field passing value index is 7.2. In contrast, the Crew's figures are 78% and 5.8 respectively, which means the Rapids create more threatening chances through their passing. In midfield control, the Rapids dominate with a ball - possession rate of 58% and an average transition time of just 12 seconds from defense to attack. This allows them to quickly launch counter - attacks. In terms of running statistics, the Rapids cover a total distance of 118 km during a game, with 350 high - intensity sprints. The Crew, on the other hand, cover 112 km and have 280 high - intensity sprintAHMLS
Columbus Crew
1-0
Colorado Rapids
48 -
WaaaghbossColumbus Crew is in a slump at home. They've suffered consecutive defeats in the league recently, and with several key players injured, the integrity of the lineup has been compromised. Although the home - team can create a certain number of shooting opportunities and their forwards have the scoring ability, there are significant flaws in the defensive coordination. They've conceded goals in multiple consecutive matches and struggle to defuse opponents' attacks effectively. Despite their strong desire to grab points at home, there are obvious deficiencies in the connection between offense and defense, making it hard for them to control the game's rhythm for a long time. On the other hand, the overall competitive form of the Colorado Rapids is on the rise. They've achieved a good win - rate at home recently. Their midfield has sufficient interception ability, and they've built a mature defense system. The efficiency of their counter - attacks is also decent. However, their performance oAHMLS
Columbus Crew
1-0
Colorado Rapids
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X