APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Iqbal ahmad>

    New England Revolution VS Atlanta United

    USA Major League Soccer
    Analysis More Tips
    New England Revolution
    New England Revolution
    Atlanta United
    Atlanta United
    Further Reading
    • BET ENSURED
      BET ENSURED
      New England Stats In the last games, New England has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 50%, while their draw rate stands at 20%. On the other hand, they lost 30% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 40% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 20% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, New England scores 1 goals per game and concedes 1 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 20% of the games, and the team scored in 70% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 20% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 60% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 40% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 10%, and losing with BTTS in 10%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 10% of the games, 1 goal in 20% of the games, 2 goals in 10% of the games, 3 goals in 50% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 10% of the games. Atlanta Utd Stats In their recent games, Atlanta Utd has demonstrated vari
      AH
      MLS New England Revolution - Atlanta United
    • Adin Reports
      Adin Reports
      New England Revolution shows a stronger overall performance compared to Atlanta United. In terms of offensive efficiency, New England Revolution's full - field offensive conversion rate is 22%, which is superior to Atlanta United's 16%. The xG value of 1.8 for New England Revolution indicates a greater offensive threat than Atlanta United's 1.2. Regarding passing, New England Revolution has a key passing success rate of 68%, leading Atlanta United's 59%. The value of forward passes reaches 4.2 times per 90 minutes. In midfield control, New England Revolution averages 12.3 tackles per game. Their transition speed is 1.8 seconds per time, faster than Atlanta United's 2.1 seconds. In terms of physical performance, the total running distance of New England Revolution is 118 km, higher than Atlanta United's 109 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 23 for New England Revolution and 17 for Atlanta United. Based on these aspects, New England Revolution seems to have a better chance in
      O/U
      MLS New England Revolution - Atlanta United
    • Stockradamus
      Stockradamus
      New England Revolution has been in a slump since the start of the season. In their last 10 games, they've won 5, drawn 2, and lost 3. On the other hand, Atlanta United has a record of 3 wins, 2 draws, and 5 losses in their last 10 matches. Atlanta United's goal - scoring ability is relatively poor, and their form is not outstanding. However, their forwards have strong scoring capabilities. They have an edge in terms of paper strength and head - to - head records, but unfortunately, their defense is weak. New England Revolution has been performing quite well and has achieved multiple victories recently. But having just suffered three consecutive home defeats, their morale is low. In their past encounters, there have been plenty of goals. Atlanta United may seem to play casually when trailing in the first half, which also indicates their lack of experience. The question now is whether Atlanta United can come out of this game unscathed. Given the current situation of both teams, this matc
      AH
      MLS New England Revolution - Atlanta United
    More Tips
    • Maryport shows a better offensive conversion rate of 18.3% compared to Oulu's 12.7%. The xG value of 1.24 for Maryport against 0.89 for Oulu indicates that Maryport poses a greater threat in attack. In terms of key passing success rate, Oulu's 61% is lower than Maryport's 69%, and the difference in the value of forward passes reaches 12.4. When it comes to midfield control, Maryport averages 14.2 interceptions per game and has an average transition speed of 9.8 seconds per turnover, outperforming Oulu's 11.3 seconds. In terms of running distance, Maryport covers 118.3 km, leading Oulu's 112.6 km. The number of high - intensity sprints, 17.4 for Maryport and 12.8 for Oulu, also gives Maryport an edge. I have a professional team and can provide in - depth analysis of carefully selected football matches every day. The defensive performance of Oulu shows obvious weaknesses. Their successful tackle rate is 58%, lower than Mariehamn's 66%. Also, their number of clearances is 8.3 compared to
      O/U
      FIN D1 IFK Mariehamn - AC Oulu
    • The New York Red Bulls' offensive conversion rate stands at 18%, lower than Charlotte FC's 22%. However, the Red Bulls are more efficient in expected goals (xG), with a rate of 1.1 compared to Charlotte FC's 1.3. In terms of key passes, the Red Bulls have an edge, boasting a success rate of 62% while Charlotte FC only manages 55%. The Red Bulls also have a better value in forward passes, 1.8 to 1.4. The midfield control is in favor of the New York Red Bulls as well, with a 58% control rate against Charlotte FC's 52%. Their transition speed is quicker, 1.3 seconds compared to 1.4 seconds. When it comes to physical stats, the Red Bulls cover more ground, running 112 km compared to Charlotte FC's 108 km. But they have fewer high - intensity sprints, 12 times compared to 15 times. I have a professional team. We select matches carefully and conduct in - depth analyses. Charlotte FC has shown better defensive stats than New York Red Bulls, with 14 tackles, 9 interceptions, and 6 clearances,
      O/U
      MLS New York Red Bulls - Charlotte FC
    • Houston Dynamo has been in excellent attacking form lately. Their offensive finishing conversion rate stands at an impressive 18.3%, significantly higher than Austin FC's 12.7%. In terms of passing, Houston Dynamo leads the league with a key passing success rate of 62%. They also achieve an attacking passing value of 4.2 times per 90 minutes. When it comes to midfield control, Houston Dynamo averages 14.1 tackles per game, and their transition speed is 1.8 seconds faster than their opponents. The team's total running distance reaches 118.6 kilometers, and they have 23 high - intensity sprints, both outperforming Austin FC. I have a professional team and can provide in - depth analysis of carefully selected matches. Houston Dynamo shows remarkable strength in both defense and offense, making them a strong candidate to win this game. In terms of defense, Houston Dynamo has an average of 16.4 tackles and 11.3 interceptions per game, with a clearance efficiency of 87%. Their midfield also
      AH
      MLS Houston Dynamo - Austin FC
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.