APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Iqbal ahmad>

    Fredrikstad VS Sandefjord

    Norway Eliteserien
    Analysis More Tips
    Fredrikstad
    Fredrikstad 1
    0 Sandefjord
    Sandefjord
    Further Reading
    • Knightopee
      Knightopee
      Sanderfjord has a record of 4 wins, 3 draws, and 7 losses, ranking 11th in the league. Their position in the standings is close to that of the home team, sitting comfortably in the middle of the league table and currently far from the relegation zone. This means they face a moderate pressure to grab points. The team plays with a conservative and pragmatic style. When playing away, they often voluntarily give up a large amount of ball - possession, instead setting up multiple layers of dense defenses. Forward Møller is the team's top scorer and also the pivot of the counter - attack. However, there are some concerns in their midfield. Midfielder Bjøn has been out for a long time due to injury. As a result, the team's midfield interception and forward - passing abilities have been affected, making it difficult to organize continuous offensive plays. On the positive side, the entire starting backline is fully fit, without any players facing suspension. This ensures that the team has a c
      AH
      NOR D1 Fredrikstad 1-0 Sandefjord
    • Аrtur Silva
      Аrtur Silva
      Frederikstad has had a decent home record this season, winning 3, drawing 1, and losing 2 in 6 home games, scoring 9 goals and conceding 8. Their average of 1.5 goals per home game is acceptable. However, they suffered a heavy 0 - 4 defeat away to Rosenborg in the last round. They conceded two goals within the first 13 minutes, revealing serious problems in their defense. In terms of the lineup, defensive core Sigurd Kvile has suffered a season - ending knee injury. Rotation defender Owusu is also absent. Midfielders Solloek and Holm are out due to injuries, leaving the middle and back of the field short - staffed. Sandefjord has a poor away record, often being referred to as an "away underdog". They have won 2, drawn 0, and lost 5 in 7 away games, scoring 7 goals and conceding 12. They have lost all of their last 4 away games. Nevertheless, their only two wins this season have come on the road, including victories over Brann and KFUM Oslo. Their attack mainly relies on forwards Paturi
      AH
      NOR D1 Fredrikstad 1-0 Sandefjord
    • Mr Well
      Mr Well
      When comparing the initial odds with the real - time ones, let's take a look at the performance of these two teams. Frederikstad has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency recently. In their last five matches, their offensive conversion rate is only 7.2%, and the expected goal - scoring efficiency is 18% lower than the league average. On the other hand, Sandefjord is in a much better offensive state. With an offensive conversion rate of 12.8%, they rank among the top five in the Norwegian Premier League. Their key pass success rate is as high as 83%, and the value of their forward passes is 27% higher than that of their opponents. In terms of midfield control, Sandefjord also shows dominance. They have an average ball - possession rate of 58% and a passing success rate of 91%. The number of fast - counter attacks they initiate is 1.8 times that of the home team. Looking at the running data, the away team, Sandefjord, has a high - intensity sprint distance of 1,240 meters, lead
      AH
      NOR D1 Fredrikstad 1-0 Sandefjord
    More Tips
    • Porto shows a significant edge over Gil Vicente in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive conversion rate, Porto's is 12% higher than Gil Vicente's. The xG value of Porto stands at 1.8, while Gil Vicente's is 1.2, clearly giving Porto an advantage. Regarding the value of forward passes, Porto leads with 42%. The success rate of key passes for Porto is 17%, superior to Gil Vicente's 11%. In midfield control, Porto averages 14 tackles and 9 interceptions per game. Their transition speed is 0.8 seconds faster than Gil Vicente's. The whole team runs a total distance of 118 km and has 132 high - intensity sprints, indicating better physical fitness. I have a professional team. We select and analyze matches thoroughly every day. Porto has shown a crushing advantage in offensive efficiency. Their shooting accuracy of 32% suppresses Dulcis' 18%, and their expected goals efficiency is 0.5 higher. In the midfield, Porto's interception success rate is 68%, 15 percentage points higher than Dulcis
      O/U
      POR SC FC Porto - SCU Torreense
    • I've been analyzing football matches for a long time, always aiming to provide in - depth insights. In this analysis, Philadelphia Union shows clear advantages over Atlanta United. In the offensive end, Philadelphia Union's conversion rate of offensive finishes is 12% higher than that of Atlanta United. Their xG efficiency stands at 0.78, significantly better than Atlanta's 0.55. The key passing success rate is 68% compared to Atlanta's 52%, and the value of forward passes is 23% higher. In terms of midfield control, Philadelphia Union averages 8.2 tackles per game, with a 15% improvement in transition speed. The whole team's average running distance is 11.3 km, and they have 14 more high - intensity sprints, indicating better physical fitness. Based on these aspects, Philadelphia Union seems to be in a more favorable position in this game. Atlanta United has obvious weaknesses in their defensive statistics. They average only 5.1 tackles per game, and their interception success rate of
      AH
      MLS Philadelphia Union - Atlanta United
    • Dallas FC is in a strong form recently. Their xG efficiency stands at 1.24 per 90 minutes, ranking among the top three in the league. In contrast, the Los Angeles Galaxy's offensive conversion rate is only 18.3%, lower than the league average. There is a significant difference in the key pass success rate between the two sides. Dallas FC creates 0.78 more valuable forward passes per 90 minutes than the Galaxy. In midfield control, Dallas FC makes 2.1 more tackles per game on average, and their transition speed is 12% faster. Running data shows that Dallas FC has 58 high - intensity sprints per game, 14% more than the Galaxy. On the defensive end, Dallas FC's interception success rate is 68%, better than the Galaxy's 59%, and they also make 3.2 more clearances. In terms of offensive efficiency, Dallas FC's scoring opportunity conversion rate is 21.7%, higher than the Galaxy's 16.4%. The xG comparison indicates that Dallas FC has an expected goal of 1.82 for the whole game, while the Gal
      AH
      MLS Los Angeles Galaxy - FC Dallas
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.