APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Stockradamus>

    Chelsea VS Juventus

    International Club Friendly
    Analysis More Tips
    Chelsea
    Chelsea 0
    1 Juventus
    Juventus
    Further Reading
    • blume
      blume
      Chelsea has been struggling in recent home games. Their home - game winning percentage stands at just 33.3%, with a record of 2 wins, 0 draws, and 4 losses. They average 0.83 goals per game while conceding 1.33 goals, which clearly shows significant defensive flaws. Looking at all their matches, Chelsea's overall winning rate is 30%. They average 1.3 goals per game, but unfortunately, they also concede 1.8 goals per match. Their goal difference is - 0.5. This indicates that while their offensive efficiency is decent, their defensive stability leaves much to be desired. On the other hand, Juventus, as the visiting team, has demonstrated a strong away - game form. They have a remarkable away record of 3 wins, 3 draws, and 0 losses, resulting in a high winning rate of 50%. They score an average of 0.83 goals per away game and concede only 0.33 goals, which is a great defensive performance. Chelsea has been struggling at home recently. Their home - game winning rate stands at just 33.3%, w
      AH
      INT CF Chelsea 0-1 Juventus
    • Oscar El Monix〽️🐐
      Oscar El Monix〽️🐐
      Chelsea has faced challenges in achieving offensive - defensive balance in their recent pre - season warm - up matches. In a recent home friendly, they lost 1 - 2 to Tottenham Hotspur. Although they managed a 1 - 1 tie in the first half, they conceded a goal in the second half with an equal 1 - 1 corner situation. In another away game, Chelsea suffered a 4 - 6 defeat to the Western Sydney Wanderers. The corner kick statistics were 8 - 7 in favor of the home - team Western Sydney, indicating their inefficiency in organizing attacks on the road. Data shows that in their last two friendlies, Chelsea scored 5 goals but conceded 8, with an average of 4 goals conceded per game, highlighting obvious defensive weaknesses. Looking back at the end of the Premier League season, Chelsea had a 2 - 1 home win over Tottenham but a 1 - 3 away loss to Nottingham Forest. The corner kick data in these two matches was 3 - 4 and 10 - 1 respectively, showing a lack of consistent offensive firepower. On the
      AH
      INT CF Chelsea 0-1 Juventus
    • Garoux 777
      Garoux 777
      Juventus has been struggling at home recently, with a home - game winning rate of just 33.3%. Their home record stands at 2 wins, 0 draws, and 4 losses. They average 0.83 goals per game and concede 1.33 goals, indicating clear defensive flaws. Looking at Chelsea's overall game statistics, their overall winning rate is 30%. They score 1.3 goals per game on average but concede 1.8 goals, with a goal difference of -0.5. This shows that while their offensive efficiency is decent, their defensive stability is lacking. On the other hand, Juventus has shown strong form as the away team. Their away record is 3 wins, 3 draws, and 0 losses, resulting in a high winning rate of 50%. They average 0.83 goals per game and concede only 0.33 goals, being highly efficient in both attack and defense. In terms of overall data, Juventus has a 50% winning rate, averaging 1 goal and conceding 0.5 goals per game, with a goal difference of +0.5. Clearly, Juventus has a much better balance between offense and d
      O/U
      INT CF Chelsea 0-1 Juventus
    More Tips
    • Tampere predominantly employs a 4-3-3 offensive formation. This setup endows the team with substantial front - line attacking power. The coordination between the flanks and the center is smooth, and there are numerous goal - scoring threats in the forward line. When playing at home, Tampere is bold enough to launch aggressive attacks. However, there are weaknesses in Tampere's defensive organization. There are obvious gaps behind the full - backs when they push forward, and the defenders are more prone to making mistakes under physical challenges. On the other hand, KPV Kokola uses a 4-2-3-1 formation. The team is characterized by rapid counter - attacking speed. The forwards have good finishing abilities. Nevertheless, the overall strength of KPV Kokola's defense is relatively weak. They may struggle to withstand continuous high - intensity attacks from opponents. Tampere has problems in its defensive line coordination. There are obvious gaps behind the full - backs when they push for
      O/U
      FIN D3 A Tampere United - KPV
    • Chicago Fire has had a decent run, winning 6, drawing 1, and losing 3 in their last 10 games. They've shown good form in recent matches. On the other hand, Vancouver Whitecaps have a similar record, winning 6, drawing 3, and losing 1 in their last 10. With a higher - scoring bench, Chicago Fire can be inconsistent. Recently, due to player injuries, Chicago Fire's performance has been poor. Vancouver Whitecaps' forwards have underperformed, clearly lagging behind Chicago Fire. In the last four games, Chicago Fire has shown acceptable form. However, they don't have a significant edge in this match. Every game matters for both teams' recent records, so both sides will be highly motivated. In terms of the lineup, Chicago Fire has a bit of an advantage. It remains to be seen whether they can capitalize on this or if Vancouver Whitecaps will stage a comeback. The Vancouver Whitecaps' forwards have been underperforming, clearly inferior to their opponents in terms of recent displays. In contr
      O/U
      MLS Chicago Fire - Vancouver Whitecaps
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.