APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Mr Well>

    Vasco da Gama VS Santos

    Brazil Serie A
    Analysis More Tips
    Vasco da Gama
    Vasco da Gama
    Santos
    Santos
    Further Reading
    • Nö Lie Män📵
      Nö Lie Män📵
      Vasco da Gama has a solid home - field performance in the Brazilian Serie A. In their head - to - head encounters with Santos, they've shown a certain degree of dominance. Looking at historical data, Vasco da Gama achieved a record of two wins and one loss in three official home games against Santos. Among them, a 2 - 1 comeback victory was particularly significant. The team was trailing 0 - 1 at half - time but managed to score two goals in the second half to turn the game around, which highlights their tactical adjustment ability and mental strength. The corner - kick statistics further confirm Vasco da Gama's offensive and defensive efficiency. When playing at home, they often have an advantage in corner - kick possession. For instance, in one game, the corner - kick ratio was 2 - 3 (2 for the home team and 3 for the away team), and in another, it was 1 - 2. In a Brazilian Cup match, the ratio was 5 - 4. This indicates that set - piece attacks are an important scoring method for the
      AH
      BRA D1 Vasco da Gama - Santos
    • Ian Rapoport
      Ian Rapoport Won 4/6
      Vasco da Gama's current position in the league table adds pressure as they sit at 18th. Their performance has been lackluster so far. However, they've shown some stability, having maintained an unbeaten streak for seven rounds after a home draw against Olimpia Asunción in the South American Cup. Looking at their home form, Vasco da Gama has a high unbeaten rate in their last ten home games, with four wins, four draws, and two losses. This gives them an edge on their home turf. But their attacking power leaves something to be desired, averaging just 1.1 goals per game. On the bright side, their defense has been solid, conceding only 0.7 goals per game. On the other hand, Santos is also in a tough spot, sitting at 17th in the standings with sub - par performances. Their form has been inconsistent, winning their last South American Cup home game against Macará but having a record of two wins, one draw, and one loss in the last four rounds. In away games, Santos has a decent unbeaten rat
      AH
      BRA D1 Vasco da Gama - Santos
    • Аrtur Silva
      Аrtur Silva
      Vasco da Gama is in a poor run of form, having failed to win in six consecutive league matches, with four defeats during this period. In their last game, they drew 0 - 0 away against Bahia, showing a low - efficiency attack. This season, at home, they need an average of 14.7 shots to score a goal, making them one of the teams with the lowest home offensive efficiency in the Brazilian league. However, their defense has performed decently at home, as opponents need an average of 8.6 shots to break through Vasco's goal. Santos is also struggling. They have yet to win an away game this season (0 wins, 4 draws, and 5 losses), with a zero away - win rate. Their away defense has many flaws, as opponents can break through their goal with an average of just 6.6 shots, ranking them among the worst in away - game defense in the Brazilian league. On the bright side, their away offensive efficiency is acceptable, with an average of one goal for every 10.4 shots. The two teams are evenly matched in
      O/U
      BRA D1 Vasco da Gama - Santos
    More Tips
    • When comparing the initial odds with the real - time data: Brann has a poor recent home - offensive conversion rate of only 12%, which is lower than the Norwegian Premier League average of 18%. On the contrary, HamKam has an xG efficiency of 1.35 on the road, significantly higher than Brann's 1.02. HamKam leads the league with a key - pass success rate of 68%, and the value of their forward passes is 42% higher than that of Brann. In midfield statistics, HamKam averages 14 interceptions per game, 5 more than Brann. They can complete an attack - defense transition in an average of 2.3 seconds, 0.8 seconds faster than Brann. HamKam also shows greater physical strength, with a high - intensity sprint count of 112 per game, 27% more than Brann. I've been analyzing football matches for a long time, and based on these stats, HamKam seems to have a significant edge in this game. Haugesund shows remarkable offensive efficiency with an average of 6.2 key passes per game, creating 3.8 excellent
      AH
      NOR D1 Brann - Ham-Kam
    • When comparing the initial odds with the real-time data, the following analysis emerges. Moscow Spartak shows clear offensive superiority. Their full - game offensive conversion rate is 23.6%, better than Batka's 18.2%. The xG efficiency value of 1.85 against Batka's 1.21 further demonstrates this edge. In terms of passing, Moscow Spartak's key pass success rate is 62%, leading Batka by 12 percentage points. They also have a high - value forward - field passing frequency of 4.7 times per 90 minutes. In the midfield, Moscow Spartak has 19 interceptions compared to Batka's 12. Their average transition speed is 1.8 seconds per play, 0.5 seconds faster than their opponents. The team makes 28 high - intensity sprints and covers a total running distance of 112.3 kilometers, both figures being over 10% higher than Batka. On the defensive end, Moscow Spartak makes 14 tackles, 9 interceptions, and 6 clearances, effectively blocking Batka's attacks. I've got a knack for in - depth match analysis
      AH
      RUS PR Baltika Kaliningrad - Spartak Moscow
    • When comparing the initial and real - time data: Frederikstad shows a higher conversion efficiency in the offensive end. In the last five matches, their offensive conversion rate is 21.3%, which is higher than Kristiansund's 16.8%. The xG values of 0.89 and 0.62 respectively also reflect Frederikstad's more efficient attack. Kristiansund has a 72% success rate in key passes, leading in this aspect. However, their forward - field pass value of 1.23 is lower than Frederikstad's 1.41, indicating a slightly weaker midfield control. In terms of physical performance, Frederikstad has an edge. Their running distance is 118.3 km, better than Kristiansund's 112.7 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 23 compared to Kristiansund's 18, showing a stronger physical advantage. I recommend setting up app notifications to receive timely suggestions and enjoy daily surprises. Christianstads' midfield transition speed is remarkable, averaging a 1.8 - second offensive - defensive switch, 0.5 seco
      AH
      NOR D1 Fredrikstad - Kristiansund BK
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.